Archive for the ‘US Politics’ Category

Strassel: The President Has a List (Osbama intimidating donors to Mitt Romney’s campaign.)

Friday, April 27th, 2012

Our beloved Prezident Barack “The Bullshevik” Osama-Obama-Yomama letting his enemies know whazzzup! ūüėČ
 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304723304577368280604524916.html

Try this thought experiment: You decide to donate money to Mitt Romney. You want change in the Oval Office, so you engage in your democratic right to send a check.

Several days later, President Barack Obama, the most powerful man on the planet, singles you out by name. His campaign brands you a Romney donor, shames you for “betting against America,” and accuses you of having a “less-than-reputable” record. The message from the man who controls the Justice Department (which can indict you), the SEC (which can fine you), and the IRS (which can audit you), is clear: You made a mistake donating that money.

Are you worried?

Richard Nixon’s “enemies list” appalled the country for the simple reason that presidents hold a unique trust. Unlike senators or congressmen, presidents alone represent all Americans. Their powers¬óto jail, to fine, to bankrupt¬óare also so vast as to require restraint. Any president who targets a private citizen for his politics is de facto engaged in government intimidation and threats. This is why presidents since Nixon have carefully avoided the practice.

Save Mr. Obama, who acknowledges no rules. This past week, one of his campaign websites posted an item entitled “Behind the curtain: A brief history of Romney’s donors.” In the post, the Obama campaign named and shamed eight private citizens who had donated to his opponent. Describing the givers as all having “less-than-reputable records,” the post went on to make the extraordinary accusations that “quite a few” have also been “on the wrong side of the law” and profiting at “the expense of so many Americans.”

These are people like Paul Schorr and Sam and Jeffrey Fox, investors who the site outed for the crime of having “outsourced” jobs. T. Martin Fiorentino is scored for his work for a firm that forecloses on homes. Louis Bacon (a hedge-fund manager), Kent Burton (a “lobbyist”) and Thomas O’Malley (an energy CEO) stand accused of profiting from oil. Frank VanderSloot, the CEO of a home-products firm, is slimed as a “bitter foe of the gay rights movement.”

These are wealthy individuals, to be sure, but private citizens nonetheless. Not one holds elected office. Not one is a criminal. Not one has the barest fraction of the position or the power of the U.S. leader who is publicly assaulting them.

“We don’t tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things,” says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor general. “When you have the power of the presidency¬óthe power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA, the SEC¬ówhat you have effectively done is put these guys’ names up on ‘Wanted’ posters in government offices.” Mr. Olson knows these tactics, having demanded that the 44th president cease publicly targeting Charles and David Koch of Koch Industries, which he represents. He’s been ignored.

The real crime of the men, as the website tacitly acknowledges, is that they have given money to Mr. Romney. This fundraiser of a president has shown an acute appreciation for the power of money to win elections, and a cutthroat approach to intimidating those who might give to his opponents.

He’s targeted insurers, oil firms and Wall Street¬óletting it be known that those who oppose his policies might face political or legislative retribution. He lectured the Supreme Court for giving companies more free speech and (falsely) accused the Chamber of Commerce of using foreign money to bankroll U.S. elections. The White House even ginned up an executive order (yet to be released) to require companies to list political donations as a condition of bidding for government contracts. Companies could bid but lose out for donating to Republicans. Or they could quit donating to the GOP¬óMr. Obama’s real aim.

The White House has couched its attacks in the language of “disclosure” and the argument that corporations should not have the same speech rights as individuals. But now, says Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation, “he’s doing the same at the individual level, for anyone who opposes his policies.” Any giver, at any level, risks reprisal from the president of the United States.

It’s getting worse because the money game is not going as Team Obama wants. Super PACs are helping the GOP to level the playing field against Democratic super-spenders. Prominent financial players are backing Mr. Romney. The White House’s new strategy is thus to delegitimize Mr. Romney (by attacking his donors) as it seeks to frighten others out of giving.

The Obama campaign has justified any action on the grounds that it has a right to “hold the eventual Republican nominee accountable,” but this is a dodge. Politics is rough, but a president has obligations that transcend those of a candidate. He swore an oath to protect and defend a Constitution that gives every American the right to partake in democracy, free of fear of government intimidation or disfavored treatment. If Mr. Obama isn’t going to act like a president, he bolsters the argument that he doesn’t deserve to be one.

Climategate – “The great global warming collapse”

Saturday, February 6th, 2010

http://dailycaller.com/an-inconvenient-review-after-10-years-al-gores-film-is-still-alarmingly-inaccurate/

The eco/enviro-Marxists (AKA ‘watermelons’ = enviro-green on the outside, communist red on the inside) have suffered a great defeat in their attempts to deceive and scare-monger the world into “changing its ways” by claiming that “global warming” is anthropogenic, the result of human activity that causes the release of carbon dioxide, methane, and a few other “greenhouse gases”, etc. Since they’re Marxist malcontents at heart, their prescription for a solution is always the same: bigger, badder government to control economic activity, which means more regulations and taxes.

The hoax/scam of anthropogenic global warming has raked in billions of dollars in taxes, grants, carbon credit/trade utter nonsense, etc. so when the climategate scandal hit, you knew these freaks would dig in and downplay its significance, but I don’t think they’re gonna get away with it. Not this time. Anyway, I’ve linked and pasted a good article about this below.

The great global warming collapse

“As the science scandals keep coming, the air has gone out of the climate-change movement”

In 2007, the most comprehensive report to date on global warming, issued by the respected United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made a shocking claim: The Himalayan glaciers could melt away as soon as 2035.

These glaciers provide the headwaters for Asia’s nine largest rivers and lifelines for the more than one billion people who live downstream. Melting ice and snow would create mass flooding, followed by mass drought. The glacier story was reported around the world. Last December, a spokesman for the World Wildlife Fund, an environmental pressure group, warned, ¬ďThe deal reached at Copenhagen will have huge ramifications for the lives of hundreds of millions of people who are already highly vulnerable due to widespread poverty.¬Ē To dramatize their country’s plight, Nepal’s top politicians strapped on oxygen tanks and held a cabinet meeting on Mount Everest.

But the claim was rubbish, and the world’s top glaciologists knew it. It was based not on rigorously peer-reviewed science but on an anecdotal report by the WWF itself. When its background came to light on the eve of Copenhagen, Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the IPCC, shrugged it off. But now, even leading scientists and environmental groups admit the IPCC is facing a crisis of credibility that makes the Climategate affair look like small change.

¬ďThe global warming movement as we have known it is dead,¬Ē the brilliant analyst Walter Russell Mead says in his blog on The American Interest. It was done in by a combination of bad science and bad politics.

The impetus for the Copenhagen conference was that the science makes it imperative for us to act. But even if that were true ¬Ė and even if we knew what to do ¬Ė a global deal was never in the cards. As Mr. Mead writes, ¬ďThe global warming movement proposed a complex set of international agreements involving vast transfers of funds, intrusive regulations in national economies, and substantial changes to the domestic political economies of most countries on the planet.¬Ē Copenhagen was never going to produce a breakthrough. It was a dead end.

And now, the science scandals just keep on coming. First there was the vast cache of e-mails leaked from the University of East Anglia, home of a crucial research unit responsible for collecting temperature data. Although not fatal to the science, they revealed a snakepit of scheming to keep contradictory research from being published, make imperfect data look better, and withhold information from unfriendly third parties. If science is supposed to be open and transparent, these guys acted as if they had a lot to hide.

Despite widespread efforts to play down the Climategate e-mails, they were very damaging. An investigation by the British newspaper The Guardian ¬Ė among the most aggressive advocates for action on climate change ¬Ė has found that a series of measurements from Chinese weather stations were seriously flawed, and that documents relating to them could not be produced.

Meantime, the IPCC ¬Ė the body widely regarded, until now, as the ultimate authority on climate science ¬Ė is looking worse and worse. After it was forced to retract its claim about melting glaciers, Mr. Pachauri dismissed the error as a one-off. But other IPCC claims have turned out to be just as groundless.

For example, it warned that large tracts of the Amazon rain forest might be wiped out by global warming because they are extremely susceptible to even modest decreases in rainfall. The sole source for that claim, reports The Sunday Times of London, was a magazine article written by a pair of climate activists, one of whom worked for the WWF. One scientist contacted by the Times, a specialist in tropical forest ecology, called the article ¬ďa mess.¬Ē

Worse still, the Times has discovered that Mr. Pachauri’s own Energy and Resources Unit, based in New Delhi, has collected millions in grants to study the effects of glacial melting ¬Ė all on the strength of that bogus glacier claim, which happens to have been endorsed by the same scientist who now runs the unit that got the money. Even so, the IPCC chief is hanging tough. He insists the attacks on him are being orchestrated by companies facing lower profits.

Until now, anyone who questioned the credibility of the IPCC was labelled as a climate skeptic, or worse. But many climate scientists now sense a sinking ship, and they’re bailing out. Among them is Andrew Weaver, a climatologist at the University of Victoria who acknowledges that the climate body has crossed the line into advocacy. Even Britain’s Greenpeace has called for Mr. Pachauri’s resignation. India says it will establish its own body to monitor the effects of global warming because it ¬ďcannot rely¬Ē on the IPCC.

None of this is to say that global warming isn’t real, or that human activity doesn’t play a role, or that the IPCC is entirely wrong, or that measures to curb greenhouse-gas emissions aren’t valid. But the strategy pursued by activists (including scientists who have crossed the line into advocacy) has turned out to be fatally flawed.

By exaggerating the certainties, papering over the gaps, demonizing the skeptics and peddling tales of imminent catastrophe, they’ve discredited the entire climate-change movement. The political damage will be severe. As Mr. Mead succinctly puts it: ¬ďSkeptics up, Obama down, cap-and-trade dead.¬Ē That also goes for Canada, whose climate policies are inevitably tied to those of the United States.

¬ďI don’t think it’s healthy to dismiss proper skepticism,¬Ē says John Beddington, the chief scientific adviser to the British government. He is a staunch believer in man-made climate change, but he also points out the complexity of climate science. ¬ďScience grows and improves in the light of criticism. There is a fundamental uncertainty about climate change prediction that can’t be changed.¬Ē In his view, it’s time to stop circling the wagons and throw open the doors. How much the public will keep caring is another matter.

Bullshevik Barack “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN” Osbama as “The Joker”

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Spoof-poster-Obamas-face-painted-The-Joker-branded-dangerous-mean-spirited.html

The neo-Marxist Left and other assorted, perpetually malcontent douchebags of the American Left, are upset that somebody dared to depict this miserable failure of a president (THAT’S RIGHT, I SAID IT! HE’S A MISERABLE FAILURE!) as The Joker, the Batman villain from the recent movie The Dark Knight. All I have to say is HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Eh, on second thought, I DO have more to say… It’s soooo damn close to reality… I mean for one thing, this man doesn’t have very many normal friends; most seem to be societal malcontents, especially the two communist-terrorists, Billy “the bombthrower” Ayers and his wife Bernadine whose terror group was responsible for BOMBING the Pentagon, the Capitol, etc. I’ve been saying and thinking it for a long time: he’s got the same chip on his shoulders as all the radicals that he hung out with, it’s just that he hid it very well and with a lapdog media on his side, he was able to roll right into the WhiteHouse… These friends of his are and always were a roadmap towards understanding who he is and what’s lurking inside that head of his, something we’re learning more and more as his horrifying presidency unfolds!

Now, how upset do you think the little darlings were when their comrades of Vanity Fair did the same fucking thing to the previous president? Scroll down to the second picture. I bet they had a real good laugh at that Bush picture, but I also bet that NOW the joke isn’t funny anymore, right? You can hear them now: This is an OUTRAGE, mean-spirited, dangerous, you rabid right-wingers need to stop that shit! No, we’re not gonna stop that shit; what we’re gonna do is come out in droves and vote as if our very lives depended on it in the 2010 elections to save the fucking country from this nightmare! Yesss, nightmare! There is a very good chance republicans can win back the House of Representatives from the freaks, so there is light at the end of the tunnel, but it’s ~15 months away… ūüôĀ

barackthejoker-article-1204213-05f20cc3000005dc-96_468x675

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2008/07/bush-as-joker.html

bush-the-joker002-copy1

Which president do you think deserves this depiction more, Barack or Bush ? Decide.

Karl Rove on Prezidente Bolshevik Milhous Nobama

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

This is a great political critique by Karl Rove I had to share. The American Left and democrats turned Karl Rove into a great demon of our time, so it’s nice to see him mixing it up these days and fighting back. At any rate, he nails Bolshevik Barack-Iraq NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN/NOT-THAT-OSAMA Obama-YoMama-Alabama-Havana pretty good with this so here it is:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124286200693341141.html

Barack Obama inherited a set of national-security policies that he rejected during the campaign but now embraces as president. This is a stunning and welcome about-face.

For example, President Obama kept George W. Bush’s military tribunals for terror detainees after calling them an “enormous failure” and a “legal black hole.” His campaign claimed last summer that “court systems . . . are capable of convicting terrorists.” Upon entering office, he found out they aren’t.

He insisted in an interview with NBC in 2007 that Congress mandate “consequences” for “a failure to meet various benchmarks and milestones” on aid to Iraq. Earlier this month he fought off legislatively mandated benchmarks in the $97 billion funding bill for Iraq and Afghanistan.

Mr. Obama agreed on April 23 to American Civil Liberties Union demands to release investigative photos of detainee abuse. Now’s he reversed himself. Pentagon officials apparently convinced him that releasing the photos would increase the risk to U.S. troops and civilian personnel.

Throughout his presidential campaign, Mr. Obama excoriated Mr. Bush’s counterinsurgency strategy in Iraq, insisting it could not succeed. Earlier this year, facing increasing violence in Afghanistan, Mr. Obama rejected warnings of a “quagmire” and ordered more troops to that country. He isn’t calling it a “surge” but that’s what it is. He is applying in Afghanistan the counterinsurgency strategy Mr. Bush used in Iraq.

As a candidate, Mr. Obama promised to end the Iraq war by withdrawing all troops by March 2009. As president, he set a slower pace of drawdown. He has also said he will leave as many as 50,000 Americans troops there.

These reversals are both praiseworthy and evidence that, when it comes to national security, being briefed on terror threats as president is a lot different than placating MoveOn.org and Code Pink activists as a candidate. The realities of governing trump the realities of campaigning.

We are also seeing Mr. Obama reverse himself on the domestic front, but this time in a manner that will do more harm than good.

Mr. Obama campaigned on “responsible fiscal policies,” arguing in a speech on the Senate floor in 2006 that the “rising debt is a hidden domestic enemy.” In his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention, he pledged to “go through the federal budget line by line, eliminating programs that no longer work.” Even now, he says he’ll “cut the deficit . . . by half by the end of his first term in office” and is “rooting out waste and abuse” in the budget.

However, Mr. Obama’s fiscally conservative words are betrayed by his liberal actions. He offers an orgy of spending and a bacchanal of debt. His budget plans a 25% increase in the federal government’s share of the GDP, a doubling of the national debt in five years, and a near tripling of it in 10 years.

On health care, Mr. Obama’s election ads decried “government-run health care” as “extreme,” saying it would lead to “higher costs.” Now he is promoting a plan that would result in a de facto government-run health-care system. Even the Washington Post questions it, saying, “It is difficult to imagine . . . benefits from a government-run system.”

Making adjustments in office is one thing. Constantly governing in direct opposition to what you said as a candidate is something else. Mr. Obama’s flip-flops on national security have been wise; on the domestic front, they have been harmful.

In both cases, though, we have learned something about Mr. Obama. What animated him during the campaign is what historian Forrest McDonald once called “the projection of appealing images.” All politicians want to project an appealing image. What Mr. McDonald warned against is focusing on this so much that an appealing image “becomes a self-sustaining end unto itself.” Such an approach can work in a campaign, as Mr. Obama discovered. But it can also complicate life once elected, as he is finding out.

Mr. Obama’s appealing campaign images turned out to have been fleeting. He ran hard to the left on national security to win the nomination, only to discover the campaign commitments he made were shallow and at odds with America’s security interests.

Mr. Obama ran hard to the center on economic issues to win the general election. He has since discovered his campaign commitments were obstacles to ramming through the most ideologically liberal economic agenda since the Great Society.

Mr. Obama either had very little grasp of what governing would involve or, if he did, he used words meant to mislead the public. Neither option is particularly encouraging. America now has a president quite different from the person who advertised himself for the job last year. Over time, those things can catch up to a politician.

Mr. Rove is the former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to President George W. Bush.

Black Bush Confirmed…

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

Black Bush Confirmed

The poor, neo-Marxist, teleprompter-driven President (aka Prezident Ba-KillBabyWithA-Rock “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN AND NOT-THAT-OSAMA” OBAMA-YOMAMA-ALABAMA) hasn’t been doing so well as of late… Awwwwww. In point of fact, he’s shaping up to being the disaster that I always expected him to be and the above forum pic I came across captures it somewhat sufficiently. Others are catching on to this fact, especially now that the honeymoon phase is over, but some of us knew it beforehand and hoped that he would never get anywhere near the WhiteHouse. Unfortunately, that’s not what happened, and the only hope would appear to lie in a very demoralized republican opposition party that, to a great extent, has lost its way… Meaning, there isn’t much hope at all.

Oh, I’m sorry, I know, I know, I’m supposed to be wishing my worst political adversary “a successful presidency” and not hoping for his failure according to the drive-by liberal media establishment (this coming from the same people that wanted/needed us to lose in Iraq so as to make Bush look as bad as possible), an adversary who just happens to be diametrically opposed to nearly everything that I believe in politically… That’s ALL, no big deal… “Give the guy a break you righteous right-wingers, after all, his father was a black man from Kenya who abandoned him and the white mother when he was 2 years old, so just put ALL your political differences aside, shut up, roll over, play dead, that is, get with the program and hope that he succeeds!!!! Say it! SAY IT! ‘I, a right-winger, want Obama to succeed!’ Say it again, ‘I want Barack Millhouse Nobama to succeed!’ THAT’S MORE LIKE IT!!!! VERY GOOD!” Rrrrrrriiiiight… Heh-heh.

The neo-Marxist Left is nothing if not comical in its sort of surreal demand for loyalty and the muzzling of dissent. Among the tactics to achieve the latter is the ever despicable playing of the race card in order to foster an environment of intimidation where pretty much everybody that isn’t black is essentially disqualified from ever criticizing this man, not unless they wanna have to deal with being instantly tarred and feathered as racist, cross-burning KKK members, etc. Of course, even if you are black (and, God forbid, a republican to boot), there are ways around that too: “Uncle Tom” or even “House Nigger.” So much for improving race relations…

At any rate, this man clearly does NOT belong in the WhiteHouse running our country… In fact, I know exactly where he belongs and I’ve known it for quite a while now… Where, you ask? It’s where he should’ve stayed all along: in a Chicago university classroom, of course, as a professor indoctrinating, radicalizing young adults into “stick-it-to-the-man” revolutionaries right alongside his detestable, communist-terrorist canal-pal, Billy “the bombthrower” Ayers… Hell, they could even have that racist, lunatic, the WRONG Jeremiah Wright as an occasional guest speaker to come in and rant about those “rich white people” ruining things and even secretly engineering viruses that specifically target the black race for extinction… I’m sure Barack would’ve been just as happy doing that but his later ambitions took him much further in life, and unfortunately, we’re all gonna pay a price for it… in the trillions (and by golly, not a penny more than necessary)…

Inauguration Day of the certified BabyKiller (Ya ain’t *my* prezident…)

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Well folks, WELCOME to The Obama Nation: 2009-2012! It’s official… Are you excited? Are you excited for the¬†“change” that is coming, whatever¬†said ambiguous “change” (oldest fucking recycled political slogan in the book) really means in the eyes of the messiah?¬†Buh-bye Bush, make way for the charismatic, Saul Alinsky-trained, neo-Marxist BabyKiller to step in… Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out, kekekekeke…. <Howard Dean>Yeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh</Howard Dean>, or not… ūüôĀ

It is truly remarkable in many ways considering how much he contrasts to past presidents… As I pointed out, he’s the first decidedly pro-infanticide candidate for one, no question about it… Sorry, but that is¬†not an exaggeration, a smear, a distortion… Unbelievably, it is the truth. Now, I don’t have a firm position on abortion, I don’t; I’m torn when it¬†comes to¬†hard cases, but I do feel I have a good bullshit detector and know that the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade “decision” was utter bullshit… I¬†also know that when a baby is born after a botched last-minute abortion, and you single-handedly, unilaterally try to block proposed legislation to protect said baby in THOSE particular circumstances, a baby¬†that¬†is outside of the womb, that¬†is SURELY not a “threat to the life of the mother” and is¬†simply left crying on a table to die, etc. but your logic is that because it was targeted for assassination inside the womb, the original intentions must STILL be carried out outside of the womb (to paraphrase his words, “such legislation would burden the original decision”), you¬†ARE an uncivilized fucking barbarian… Yessss, you’re exactly what your 60’s radical friends use to call Vietnam veterans returning home from the war: babykiller(s)! In that context, in THOSE circumstances, it becomes black’n’white, straight-up assassination… It’s not a clump of cells, an embryo, etc. it’s a fully formed human baby taken out with the trash after it dies 10-30 minutes after the fact… Nuff said there. The fact that he was the lone ranger on this, the ONLY one that tried to stop this legislation which later passed unanimously after he left the Illinois State Legislature earns him, in my humble view, official babykiller status! Let him be known as Barack “BabyKiller” Obama throughout his presidency. Actually, I’ll settle for using “President BabyKiller” when I’m not using Barack-Iraq NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN Obama-Osama-YoMama-Alabama…

The other contrast (there are many, but I’ll just note one more) that stands out for me is whereas presidents such as Ronald Reagan fought Marxist-Communists around the world (as well as here at home for that matter), Barack on the other hand is friends with tons of them as I’ve repetitously pointed out, two of which use to engage in a low-level civil war (typical revolutionary douchebags seeking to impose their “utopia” on the rest of us) in the 60’s by planting bombs in various governmental buildings such as Police HQs, the Pentagon, even the Capitol, etc. My God, he works in a place his friends tried to BOMB 40 years ago… Heh-heh, my my how we’ve “changed…” It’s become more and more clear the 60’s freaks and their counterculture¬†values¬†are running the show these days. You would think communist-terrorists would at least be ostracized for their past actions, right? Right??? <Auhnold>WRONG</Auhnold>, Bill Ayers and his Charles Manson-loving wife have been doing quite well for themselves and leave it to the disgraceful and always repugnant Arianna Huffington to give Bill Ayers blogspace over at Huffington Post. I salute her as this permanently discredits her and the far, far ultra-left-wing rag of a website she set up… Birds of a feather flock together has never been more appropriate here. Anyway, the quite influential, yet not well-known, Antonio Gramsci,¬†a late Italian Marxist intellectual would be quite proud today of these “historic” election results… Barack is his boy through and through as has become the democrat party more and more…

So, congratulations President BabyKiller! You won… You did what you had to do: you lied about McCain, you demagogued where needed, you told us McLame was running for Bush’s 4th term but didn’t bother to volunteer the fact that you were kinda running for B.J. Clinton’s 3rd term (weren’t cha?), what with all the Clintonistas you seem to be bringing back into WhiteHouse, even selecting Mrs. B.J. Clinton herself as Secretary of State… Nice… You successfully bought the presidency with the nearly $1 billion that was raised, a feat shattering all previous known records (“fundraising outpaced combined total of Bush and Kerry in 2004 election” – ChicagoTribune). How about that ?? Gotta give ‘im credit where credit is due…

The question now is: What kind of a nation¬†can we expect with Barack-Iraq NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN Obama-Osama-YoMama-Alabama and a democrat-controlled Congress??? In Obama Nation, every time legal bullies such as the ACLU or other like-minded Marxist organizations bring forward a law suit, they WIN! You see, for Marxist radicals, you can’t leave things like that to chance, to honest interpretation of the law, the Constitution, etc. No no no no… You NEED a rigged system, a system packed with lapdogs that always “make the right decision” regardless of what the law says… You NEED to insulate the system from future democratic results and accountability which is automatic with a corrupt judge and a lifetime appointment (much like a bad professor and tenure)… Why limit/restrict yourself to the actual “words” in the Constitution or other body of law when they don’t square with your own personal policy preferences? That’s so outdated… You’ve got an agenda to advance after all and cannot allow little annoying things like decency, honor, rule-of-law, democracy, etc. to stand in the way… Democracy is just a bourgeois dictatorship when the knuckle-dragging redneck/hick/reactionary/throwback majority¬†doesn’t see things your way and you know you’re so much more¬†smarter and enlightened than they are, so FUCK ‘EM FUCK ‘EM FUCK ‘EM in those cases which is what radical, corrupted courts are for!!¬†So, in short, a federal court system packed with Marxist lapdogs ready & willing to make wild decisions, taking activism to a whole new level, will be one characteristic of Obama Nation… Barack “thinks” that the Warren court wasn’t “all that radical” which provides quite an indication of where he’d like to take the strategy of court-packing, one of FDR’s favorites which led to the short-circuiting of the Constitution’s safeguards against federal centralization among many other unconstitutional changes…

NightWolve, you¬†DO know you’re supposed shut the hell up and fall in line as this is a historic occasion, right? I mean, a black man from Kenya fertilized a white woman from Kansas and out came cokehead Barack the BabyKiller who went on to become President, so you gotta recognize the historic nature of this event and do your patriotic duty by supporting and wishing him a successful presidency!!!! OH FUCKING REALLY???? REEAAALLLLY??? Anybody remember that being the drive-by media’s template when Clarence Thomas was nominated for the Supreme Court? No, he was targetted for COMPLETE destruction… A high-tech lynching as he put it… His crime? He would honestly interpret the Consitution and not make up bullshit as he went along (thus a threat to Roe v. Wade)… He was to receive NO BENEFIT whatsoever for being black, so when it comes to ideology, make no mistake, the neo-Marxist Left picks and chooses who is to receive such a benefit when/if¬†he/she is¬†one of “theirs.”

When any republican president was elected, did the democrats, the drive-by media ever wish them a “successful presidency?” Unheard of… You’ve got to be fucking kidding me! The insult to our intelligence is so breathtakingly astounding. It’s the fucking Twilight Zone… Seriously, does anybody remember that when Reagan won? The opposition wishing him a “successful presidency?” How about when Bush the elder won? How about this Bush???? Hahaha, fuck noooooo… The discussion back in 2000 (aside from how the election was stolen) after he won was about wanting, in midstream, to abort/abolish the electoral college¬†because it didn’t produce the desired result, a powergrab for democrats of epic proportions since they control the big cities and such a change would almost guarantee them future wins for decades to come! Always with their situational/ever-evolving ethics!!

No, I’m sorry, but he’s NOT my president and I pray that he fails with most of his policies that I oppose as would any other normal person would OTHERWISE I’D BE A FUCKING DEMOCRAT… I didn’t vote for him and NEVER would or could. I was left with a trinity of choices, that’s right, 3… My choices were¬†writing in 1) Ronald Reagan, 2) Mickey Mouse (yes, my protest votes), or 3) John McLame… I chose option (3) John McLame as the election drew closer… The reasons being (a)¬†I came to my senses thinking about the wild-eyed ACLU lunatic judges that Barack would pack the federal courts with, (b) I liked the Sarah Palin VP pick (Whatever is said about her and the poor interviews that set her back, she’ll always be¬†a better VP pick¬†than Joe “Plugs” Biden, formerly THE dumbest man in the Senate as Mark Levin long ago rightfully labeled him…) and (c) whatever differences I have with McLame, he at least FOUGHT for¬†our country in Vietnam against communists, in contrast with Barack who befriended two 60’s communist fucktard terrorists who BOMBED¬†our country…¬†FOUGHT for¬†our country versus befriending folks that FOUGHT/BOMBED our country… QUITE THE FUCKING CONTRAST AND WINNING ARGUMENT FOR ME!!!¬†Yeah, a real regular FUCKING Bob Hope kind of “patriot,” isn’t he? Uh-oh, wait, is that¬†me questioning his excessive, flag-waving “patriotism” again? Heh,¬†I still remember how he desparately tried to cover up his extensive friendship/relationship with Billy “the bomb-thrower” Ayers and the wife, but the truth came out drip by drip… A far cry from his “he was just a guy in the neighborhood” horseshit defense… Well, sorry President Ba-KillBabyWithA-rack NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN Obama,¬†I haven’t forgotten and never will.

The BARE minimum that I can do is promise to be a tad more respectful than Bush-deranged haters ever were to Bush. That’s about it… Since the neo-Marxist Left has set the bar so low for treatment of a president, it won’t be that difficult to be slightly more respectful relative to what they did (e.g. Bush=Hitler=Madman, allowed 9/11 to happen for political gain, joking about his assassination, making movies about his assassination, etc.). Surely, it can’t be that hard to avoid being the equivalent¬†Michael Moore,¬†Keith Overbite, Al Fraken, George Soros, etc., the hard Left’s favored political hitmen and financiers.

Speaking of the vile Al Fraken, it would appear the thuggish, tax-cheating, political hitman turned radio host has succeeded in stealing the Minnesota senatorial election and thus can add politician to his resume… A new era of “bipartisanship” is surely on its way with a guy¬†of Al Fraken’s caliber…¬†WHAT was Minnesota thinking?? We’re gonna¬†be stuck with him in the senate for 6 years because of some magic ballots that kept appearing and favoring him as the recount was taking place? Good God… This election was such a massacre of epic proportions and¬†I wonder how competitive the GOP can be in the next election…

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Saturday, December 20th, 2008

I heard about the shoe-throwing incident against President Bush recently and D-BOY remarked about the amazing cat-like reflexes that he demonstrated to avoid getting hit, so¬†finally, I¬†took a look at the original video only a moment ago…¬†After seeing it, I immediately thought to myself, ooh boy, here come the endless barage of, “Why, I’ll be damned… Bush actually IS good at something… har har” jokes… True to form, it didn’t take long for folks to get creative with¬†this incident and I can only¬†imagine how much worse it would’ve been if a shoe actually did hit its intended target…¬†The first¬†animated gif was¬†sent¬†to me by my¬†homie GillianSeed in a drive-by instant message;¬†it’s based on a well-known scene from the Matrix starring Keanu Reeves that was put to good use to capture the “essence” of this incident, if you will… Later, I was sent another by DeuceBag and¬†the rest I found, so all together we have Neo Bush, Santa Bush, X-Man Bush¬†& 3 Stooges v. Bush below… Which is your favorite ??

  


Here’s the original that started it all¬†if you haven’t see it:
 

You know, I think when it’s all said and done, when the dust finally settles and¬†Bush haters¬†calm themselves down, if they start looking at things objectively, they will come to worship the ground that¬†the man¬†walks on… Sounds crazy, but hear me out!¬†This particular Bush essentially gave birth¬†to (pun intended) the rolling back of the Reagan revolution¬†paving the way for a near filibuster-proof democrat Senate!¬†The 40-year majority democrats enjoyed¬†has once again been fully restored to them, first in 2006, and now¬†IN A LANDSLIDE after only a 12-year blip! THEY’RE BACK BABY AND THEY GOT LOTS AND LOTS OF PLANS FOR US!

Yes indeed, the counter-Reagan revolutionaries are in charge now headed by a highly advanced, Saul Alinsky-trained neo-Marxist by the name of Barack-Iraq “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN” Obama-Osama-YoMama-Alabama-Havana-Is-His-Nirvana all of which was unthinkable just a few years back! Welcome to the new era, the era of Nancy “the Stretch” Pelosi, Dingy Harry Reid, Barney the Frankly Degenerate, Chris “Dunderhead” Dodd, Joe “Plugs” Biden, Chuck You Schemer, etc.!!! Yessss, ladies and gentlemen, even the WhiteHouse was successfully captured¬†and the fact¬†IS that President Bush made this ALL possible for ’em so give the man credit where credit is due!! I think it’s about time¬†they set aside their¬†Bush Derangement Syndrome and seriously start to consider thanking him for their landslide victories… Don’t you ?

In other news, after getting a somewhat better handle on manipulating restricted pages provided by MS Office Live (if you really wanted your own page in full, you’d friggin’ have to code all the html in javascript and assign it¬†to the innerHTML property of the BODY tag), I set up a little Download Panel as is evident on the upper left of this utter shit excuse of a site… I also added two more patches for¬†Xak III & Ys IV, not that I expect that many to care…¬†Should you need anything else that used to be available on my previous site, just email me and I’ll happily see if I can find it for you… After all, I’m just your average,¬†humble, lovable, neighborhood fan translator, right? I exist to serve YOU, the “fan,” and seeing as how INSANELY generous (*cough cough*) you mostly all turned out to be, it’s the least that I could do!!

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

So much has gone on in the past month, I wish I had a real blog to have gotten my thoughts out on subjects like this that are of interest to me. Perhaps myspace or facebook¬†are worth looking into moving all my stuff over to and having a decent¬†format to talk about whatever, but given time constraints and all, as usual, I’ll have to settle for my current craptacular arrangements.

So yeah, black Tuesday is almost upon us, just two days away. For the first time in American history, it appears that a bona fide Bolshevik may actually succeed in capturing the WhiteHouse… THAT is what makes this election historic, not the irrelevant fact that Barack’s existence is due to the result of a black man from Kenya having donated sperm into a white woman from Kansas… Barack should neither be rewarded for being a mixed-race candidate, nor should he be punished for it. Personally, I think he’ll be rewarded¬†(affirmative action style) more so than punished for it by any racist voters.¬†Of course, ideally, he should be judged entirely by the [disturbing] contents of his mind, and most importantly, who helped fill/shape that mind (which in Barack’s case is unfortunately an unseemly array of Marxist-Communists, aka ultra-leftwing freaks) but we are far from Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech these days… more like “I have a scheme…”

I predict come Tuesday’s election results, and I pray to God that I am wrong, that communist-terrorist Bill Ayers will be celebrating, communist-terrorist Bernadine Dorhn will be celebrating, PLO communist-terrorist anti-semite Rashid Khalidi will be celebrating, members of Communist Party USA, the ACLU (aka American Criminal Liberties Union)¬†will be celebrating, communist dictators/leaders the world over will be celebrating (e.g. Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, etc.),¬†yesss ladies and gentlemen, in other words,¬†lots and lots of left-wing freaks will have smiles on their faces!!! Finally, one of their own will be in command of the WhiteHouse… Mr. “Spread the Wealth Around” himself and oh boy is he’s spreading lots of it around¬†(30 minute TV spots even) thanks to the massive ~$641 million dollar warchest that’s he’s generated. You do have to feel sorry for the bastards in a way. The poor little darlings have¬†waited so long; they deserve this as far as they’re concerned!! All the revolutions, all the killings, the purges,¬†all the Bill Ayers¬†bombs that exploded, etc., finally,¬†it has come to this!!! YAY! Yes indeed, it will be very historic in their eyes… as well as catastrophic for the rest of us, but I digress… ūüėČ

The fix is just in folks… It just is… He’s outspending McCain 4-to-1… No republican can win the WhiteHouse without Ohio and if one recalls, Bush won it by ~118,000 votes or so back in 2004. Well, Barack’s ACORN claims to have registered 200,000 new voters in that state, and recent court rulings have permitted a) same day voter registration and voting, all without having to prove residency¬†and b) listing a park bench or homeless shelter¬†as your place of residence to allow the homeless to vote!!! The voter fraud potential this has enabled is enormous…¬†Anyone from a neighboring state could come over, claim they are homeless, state that the park bench under the tree next to the duck pond is their home and be allowed to vote. Forget visitors, how many multiple votes could an actual state¬†resident cast with made-up identities? Bingo! The perfect stolen election all thanks in part to democrats’ consistent unwillingness to move to a system requiring picture ID cards among other things… Now you know why they’ve been blocking that. We’ve been turned into one of those banana republics you hear about, folks…

Anyway, I originally wanted to rant solely about how democrats are basically just getting away with blaming our current economic meltdown on republicans and actually stand to¬†benefit politically from the havoc that they have¬†caused, but more stuff popped up that I wanted to get into. However, I’ve spent too much time on what I already wrote, so I’ll have to cut it short. Basically, I have two more of Barack’s communist friends I wanted to report on, Frank Marshall Davis, a black communist and member of the CPUSA¬†and Rashid Khalidi, a former PLO¬†mouthpiece, yessss, THAT PLO: the KGB’s most enduring achievement formerly headed by that terrorist-loving sick bastard, Yassir Arafat. Sure enough, just as with Billy “bombthrower” Ayers, Rashid Khalidi was installed in the University of Chicago to spread his poison which is how he ran into our beloved messiah, candidate for president, Barack “NOT-THAT-HUSSEIN” Obama… Gotta love the American university system, eh?¬†It’s crawling with all sorts of Marxist-Communist trash… Very very diverse.

Alright, so finally getting to something that’s really been pissing me off. Democrats ran Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into the ground, used it as their own personal piggie bank, resisted attempts to reform the rampant corruption that became fairly evident and when it all blew up, their scapegoat was Bush, republicans, capitalism. And there’s ole Barack running around doing the same, blaming Reagan, capitalism, deregulation, etc. meanwhile it turns out he took advice from the disgraced CEO Franklin Raines¬†who ran Fannie Mae into the ground and made out like¬†a bandit with $90 million dollars to boot… Thankfully, somebody wrote a wonderful article that captures the outrage of what has happened. So, I’m gonna post that¬†along with some more youtube videos and call it a wrap. First the youtube videos of interest:

*** Top Ten Reasons NOT to vote for Barack Obama 10-1

*** Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (Volume 1)
*** Obama & Friends: History of Radicalism (Volume 2)

Watch the following video at least before reading the article below; it will put the article into context and you will NOT believe the utter incompetence and corruption the democrats display, but guess what, they’re ALL gonna get away with it cause they’re democrats and most of the media provides them cover:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebWJ892h5dA РShocking Video Unearthed Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis

Finally, a must-read article that tries to set the record straight:

http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2008-10-05-1.html (Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?)

An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:¬† I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism.¬† You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.¬† This housing crisis didn’t come out of nowhere.¬† It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.¬†¬† It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people.¬† Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.¬†¬† What is a risky loan?¬† It’s a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.”The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups.¬† But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can’t repay?¬† They get into a house, yes, but when they can’t make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.¬†¬† They end up worse off than before.¬†¬† This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it.¬† One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules.¬† The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.¬†¬† Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans.

(Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me.¬† It’s as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)¬†¬† Isn’t there a story here?¬† Doesn’t journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout?¬† Aren’t you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?¬†¬† I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal.¬† ‘Housing-gate,’ no doubt.¬† Or ‘Fannie-gate.’

Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.¬† As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay … ‘Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago.¬† So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President.¬† So did Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury.’¬†¬† These are facts.¬† This financial crisis was completely preventable.¬† The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was the Democratic Party.

The party that tried to prevent it was the Republican Party.¬†¬† Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie.¬† Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!¬†¬† What?¬† It’s not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?¬†¬† Now let’s follow the money right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.¬†¬† And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate’s campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.

If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.¬†¬† But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an ‘adviser’ to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama’s people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn’t listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.¬†¬† You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.¬† If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.

If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.¬†¬† There are precedents.¬† Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link.¬† (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)¬†¬† If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.

Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth.¬† That’s what you claim you do, when you accept people’s money to buy or subscribe to your paper.¬†¬† But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans.¬† You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.¬†¬† If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.¬†¬† Because that’s what honorable people do.¬† Honest people tell the truth even when they don’t like the probable consequences.¬† That’s what honesty means.¬† That’s how trust is earned.

Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one.¬† He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.¬†¬† Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards’s own adultery for many months.¬†¬† So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all,” in journalism, left? “Do you even know what honesty means?¬†¬† Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?¬†¬† You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women.

Who listens to NOW anymore?¬† We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles. That’s where you are right now.¬†It’s not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.¬†¬† If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.¬†¬† Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation’s prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama’s door.

You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a Senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis.¬† You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.¬†¬† This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.¬†¬† If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie. …¬† You’re just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it’s time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.”

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

Something bizarre caught my attention with the recent focus, FINALLY, being placed on Obama’s ties to Bill Ayers & Bernadine, this after Governor Sarah Palin rightfully went on the offensive pointing out what most in the media have been ignoring for a long time. Besides FOX News and talk radio trying to sound the alarm all this time¬†about Obama’s ties to communist-terrorist radicals, CNN actually bothered to come pretty close to accurately reporting the nature of this relationship! WTF? There was also a recent article in the New York Slimes as well, but they intentionally left out an inconvenient/contradicting¬†interview in an effort to mostly whitewash the relationship. Anyway, below is the CNN piece, a B-Cast report which I was rather impressed with and further links of interest I came across:

http://www.cnn.com/video/?JSONLINK=/video/politics/2008/10/07/griffin.obama.ayers.cnn
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=190593

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucmg/20081007/cm_ucmg/obamastruthdeficit
Barack’s ACORN involvement with mortage mess
Stanley Kurtz on Obama’s ties to Bill Ayers
Mayor Rudy Guiliani take on Obama/Ayers

One¬†thing you might’ve noticed if you’re a news junkie such as myself, is that ever since¬†Bill Ayers came up, which is unfortunately true for most of the media, is that¬†they hardly ever (well, NEVER is more like it) refer to him as a domestic communist-terrorist¬†–¬†They always leave out the communist ideology so as to protect it from negative judgement. It’s not rocket science; the communist douchebag himself admits he’s a communist. No hiding behind¬†Joseph McCarthyism here (reflexively used to protect actual communists by media elites over the years). Just something that annoys me cause had he bombed say abortion-clinics 40 years ago, you can most certainly bet that “christian fundamentalist” would be in the terrorist description… Of course, Barack Obama would never be in the position he is today if Bill Ayers and gang were once running around bombing abortion-clinics, as opposed to the Pentagon, the Capitol, Police Headquarters, etc. now would he ??

Now, the Obama freaks actually want you to think this friendship/relationship¬†doesn’t AT ALL reflect badly on his judgement…¬†Let’s say McCain had an abortion-clinic bombing freak of a friend. Would anyone seriously believe that that wouldn’t be a campaign issue ??? How stupid do Obama supporters think people are ? Moreover, would the media have been so eager to do damage control on McCain’s behalf and refer to reports about such a relationship as a distraction ?? These ultra left-wing a-holes in the media are nothing if not predictable… I just hope it’s not too late to alert the general public, the independents, the undecideds, etc.¬†that will determine the outcome of this election.

In my heart I’d like to believe that a majority of Americans, if properly and fully informed, would reject a freak like Barack Obama given all the communists that surround him, two of which are known former terrorists that set off bombs in the Pentagon and the Capitol of all places… I SAY AGAIN: BARACK IS FRIENDS WITH TWO FORMER COMMUNIST-TERRORISTS THAT BOMBED THE CAPITOL, THE PENTAGON, POLICE AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL BUILDINGS!! AM I THE ONLY ONE THAT FINDS THAT A FUCKING PROBLEM?? DO YOU KNOW WHAT ENDED THEIR REIGN OF TERROR? THEY¬†DECIDED THEY WANTED HUMAN FATALITIES¬†AND WHILE¬†MAKING A BOMB PACKED WITH NAILS, YES NAILS,¬†IT BLEW UP ON THE BASTARDS KILLING SEVERAL OF THEM!! THAT, yes ladies and gentlemen, THAT was the beginning of the end for the Weather Underground communist-terror group! They went out with a BANG! How fucking revolutionary of them! It’s just too bad that ole Billy boy and Bernadine weren’t bombed straight to hell right along with their friends that day.

Fuck man, I just don’t get it… Really, I just don’t get how you can go so far in your political career with friends like these, using these friends to help advance yourself and consistently escaping accountability for it (well, maybe that changes now, but very last minute). That scares me in it of itself, but he’s doing it… He’s doing it… Well, with that, I leave you with a little agitprop:

Please, America, please don’t send these two to the WhiteHouse… Please don’t… Barack will destroy all impartiality in the federal courts for generations with his judicial appointments of radicals in the ACLU mold, as I’ve said… What lies beneath the smooth talking exterior is a radical; a highly¬†advanced¬†neo-Marxist with additional Saul Alinsky training… This ain’t no joke. He’s the real deal…¬†If you send him to the WhiteHouse, you send a mind forged by 60’s radical freaks to the WhiteHouse. They, and most of their ideas, through him, is what will be running the country…

“STOP OBAMA EXPRESS” Youtube videos

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

Bolshevik Barack “58 states” Obama (who incidentally appears to be the first 100% pro-infanticide candidate for president, yes, exactly what his 60’s radical friends used to call troops returning from Vietnam: babykiller(s)) has been getting a free pass by the traditional US media and it’s quite an outrage so much so that I thought it best to list some youtube videos in succession that help expose who this man is and stress the point of my previous post… The first video is the most disturbing in my mind and is what really motivated me to dedicate this temporary site of mine to getting the word out. It really is the Twilight Zone in the fact that he’s not been held accountable for befriending/associating with communist-terrorist douche bags Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn.

But anyway, I don’t want this to drag on too much; I’m mainly just gonna post all the videos that you should see before you vote this November, especially if you were thinking about voting for him. I hope you’ll conclude after seeing these videos, as I have, that he is unfit for public office, let alone the presidency!! It’s an honor that he simply does not deserve for having “friends”/views like this, and again, it wouldn’t be happening if the US media wasn’t mostly in the tank for him… It’s a matter of his judgement… Seriously, what a complete f’ing outrage this is and I really pray to God he just goes down in flames come November, never to be heard from again…

Final thought: Will capitalizing on President Bush’s damage to the republican brand be enough to sneak someone as radical as Barack into the WhiteHouse under the cover/cloak of “change”??? ūüôĀ That is the question folks and I’m deeply afraid of the answer. We’re gonna find out soon enough, though…

Top Obama Youtube videos

  1. Outline of communist terror group “Weather Underground” and Barack Obama’s connections to Bill Ayers.
  2. Same as above: the political ad that Obama’s campaign team has worked to shut down/limit its public airing.
  3. Introduction to Barack Obama’s lunatic “hate-whitey” pastor/demagogue, the WRONG Jeremiah Wright.
  4. Here Obama’s “spiritual adviser” accuses the US of engineering the HIV virus (AIDS) as a means of genocide against blacks…
  • Obama’s friends/supporters recently convicted and headed for jail:
  1. Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick (with B.O.’s endorsement… Heh-heh)
  2. Slumlord briber Tony Rezko
  • This one is just plain funny: Joe Biden was against Barack Obama before he was for him, the latter flip coming after he was picked for the VP slot of course… He also supported the idea of running with John McCain too! Haha!
  • Gaffe Machine List – Find out just how “smart” he really is contrary to what the media has made you think:
  1. His “58 states” goof – Heh-heh.
  2. Showing his command of history and other whoppers (Gaffe Mania I)…
  3. Gaffe Mania II: “McCain is running for Bush’s 4th term…” ++

(I’ll keep this list updated as we head into the election if/when time permits and I find more revealing info. Remember, NOBAMA ’08! You’re not voting for McCain, you’re just voting against Obama is the idea here!!).